Open Facsimile 1 |
Previous | 1 of 14 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
Subset |
Philanthropist of Chester County. Mormonism Unmasked, Showed to be an Impious
Imposture, and Mr. Bennett’s Reply Answered and Refuted, 2– 24. Philadelphia: T. K. & P.
G. Collins, 1840.
MORMONISM UNMASKED,
SHOWED TO BE AN
IMPIOUS IMPOSTURE,
AND
MR. BENNETT’S REPLY
ANSWERED AND REFUTED.
BY
A PHILANTHROPIST
OF CHESTER COUNTY.
PHILADELPHIA:
T. K. & P. G. COLLINS, PRINTERS,
No. 1 Lodge Alley,
———
1840.
IT is not because I considered Mr. Bennett’s Reply worthy of an answer, that I have
undertaken to write again on the subject of Mormonism; nor is it, that I suppose I can by
Scripture and ratiocination, produce acknowledged conviction in the Mormons, for they appear
to have got far beyond the reach of the influence of reason and Scriptural argumentation; but it is
in order more fully to acquaint the public with their ridiculous and astounding errors,
blasphemies and wickedness.
A PHILANTHROPIST. [2]
MORMONISM UNMASKED,
AND
MR. BENNETT’S REPLY,
ANSWERED AND REFUTED,
__________________
SOME time since, a tract was written by a Philanthropist of Chester County, being an
impartial exhibition of the errors of Mormonism, as preached by their demagogues, in order to
guard persons of honest and upright intentions, against the delusive enormities of this infatuated
sect: since which time, a tract has been published, styled a Reply to the aforesaid tract, by S.
Bennett, in which his intention is, as he in the title declares, to disabuse the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints, of the slanders and falsehoods which he has attempted to fasten upon
it. Perhaps, it might not be improper, to tell Mr. Bennett that the Church of Jesus Christ,* does
not need such a mass of falsehood and slander as his tract contains, to undeceive it, and rescue it
*Mr. Bennett should here have said the church of Jo. Smith; for if Christ’s priesthood and covenant are abolished,
and Smith’s established; then the Mormons should not use his name to deceive the unwary.
from its mistakes as he imagines. For if this sect constitutes the church, and if it has the true
priesthood, apostolical doctrine and only genuine form of worship, then to disabuse it certainly
cannot be considered necessary. This is one proof among many, of the knowledge of unknown
tongues, which the Mormon demagogues profess to have. That the Mormons have been
slandered in said tract, is absolutely untrue. We can bring a number of respectable witnesses, if
required, to testify to the truth of what has been said. It is so far from being true that they have
been slandered, that but a part of the truth of their pernicious doctrines has been told. We are
now, not only prepared to substantiate what has already been said, but to exhibit more fully a
picture of their doctrines. I presume when the character of Mormonism is taken into
consideration, that I will not be deemed unjustifiably severe by the public, in portraying it, when
using in some places severe terms; since it is rather doubtful, whether language can furnish
words too strong, to give adequate ideas of it. Three particular traits in the Mormon character,
are slander, [3] imposture, and lying on every occasion, where it is judged convenient to screen
them, and cover their errors. Prompted by a spirit of gall and wormwoo, malignant as that of a
demon, and accompanied with the impudence of fiends, their intention seems to be, to prostrate
Scripture, reason, truth, religion, and all authority except their own. The following lines, will
perhaps, pretty appropriately describe the spirit of Mormonism.
A poisonous morsel in her teeth she chew’d,
And gorg’d the flesh of vipers for her food,
Which virtue loathing turn’d away her eye;
The hideous monster rising heavily,
Came stalking forward with a sullen pace,
And left her mangled offals on the place!
Soon as she saw the truth, in robes of light,
She fetch’d a groan at such a cheerful sight.
Her looks were meagre, and her darkened eye,
In foul distorted glances, turned awry;
A hoard of gall her inward parts possessed,
And spread her greenness o’er her canker’d breast;
Her teeth were brown with rust, and from her tongue
In dangling drops, the stringy poison hung.
Watchful in spite, and restless to destroy,
She pines and sickens at all others’ joy.
See MATTHEW xxiii, 15—33; and ROMANS iii, 13.
The Mormons essay to identify the opposition manifested against their pernicious
doctrines, with the persecutions of the Christians, and thus they would insinuate that, because the
community is not disposed to swallow their filthy stuff, and that because it is met with deserved
censure and abhorrence, they are persecuted. That the Mormons are persecuted for
righteousness’ sake no one will believe, who knows what righteousness is. And if they are
blessed who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, surely they are cursed who are persecuted
for wickedness sake. As well might a thief, or a murderer, who having been prosecuted, arrested,
and confined in prison, attempt to justify his crime by asserting he was persecuted, as for the
Mormons to attempt to cover up their turpitude, under the hypocritical outcry of persecution,
persecution! Now let all who have any reverence for God, any esteem for the Scripture, any
desire for salvation, and to escape the wrath to come; beware of the leaven of Mormonism, for it
is tenfold worse than hypocrisy.
Mr. Bennett affirms, “That any one who has the slightest acquaintance with American
antiquities, or Indian traditions, will find abundant evidence to establish the fact,” i. e., of the
genuineness of the golden plates or Mormon Bible; and says, for confirmation of what he
affirms, “See Priest’s American Antiquities, and A. Davis on the discovery of America by the
Northmen.” A thousand opinions, sir, concerning the aborigines [4] of this country, is no proof
of the truth of this book. And he who considers opinion sufficient to constitute a revelation,
especially, when there is nothing in that opinion to that effect, may no doubt, find revelations in
number as the sands of the sea.—Let those who wish to see, what abundant Mormon evidence
amounts to, read the books mentioned above. This is one proof among many of Mormon
veracity. If I was disposed to tell one of the most ridiculous falsehoods I could invent, I do not
know how I could better accomplish my purpose, than by making such unwarrantable assertions
as the above. To show how discordant the Mormons are in their testimony, I will mention one
instance which I know. Mr. D. in a discourse at the Westnantmeal Seminary affirmed, “That
when the golden plates were discovered, they were taken to professor Anthony, of New York,
and he could make but little out of them; they were then taken to a man in Albany, but he could
not even so much as make out a word of them. Then Mormon was endued with the gift of the
interpretation of tongues, and translated the whole of them; according to which, Mormon must
have lived since the discovery of the golden plates. Pratt in his Warning Voice, says that,
“Mormon was a general in the army of the Niphites, about A. D. 450, and that he collected the
prophecies of the Niphites, and concealed them in Cumora, to prevent their destruction by the
Lemonites,” or in words to this effect: from which, the necessity of liars having good memories
is obvious. But, perhaps, Mr. Davis then, had not read Pratt’s Warning Voice, and of course he
must give some account to satisfy curiosity when required. The absurdity of supposing the
Lemonites should intend the destruction of their own Scripture, I leave for Mr. Bennett to
account for.
The Mormons affirm, “That the present Indians, are a part of the half tribe of Joseph, and
that they sailed to this country across the Atlantic Ocean; being furnished with a compass by the
hand of God.” We must of course presume that they were furnished also with a knowledge of
navigation, reading, writing, &c. It is now nearly 350 years since this country was discovered;
during which time, the Indians have had communication with English, French, Spanish, Dutch,
&c., from whom they have procured guns, swords, axes, coins, &c. Some of these articles being
lost long since, and recently found, are no doubt judged to be the work of the aborigines. But are
there not mounds, forts, and the remains of towns, that show that the inhabitants of this country
were once acquainted with the arts and sciences? I answer that these remains will not prove any
greater degree of perfection in the arts, than that which was exhibited among the Mexicans, when
first visited by the Spanish. No remains of antiquity, which can be proved to be the work of the
inhabitants of this country, previous to its discovery, will constitute even so much as a shadow of
proof, that the sciences of [5] reading and writing, much less, that of navigation and compasses
were ever known here. The Israelites, so far as we are acquainted with their history, were versed
in the arts and sciences: emigrating to this country (passing by the difficulties, attending their
emancipation and marching in a body, through barbarous nations of people:) they would of
course, not leave their useful knowledge behind them. We may reasonably presume, they would
bring along with them the Scripture of the Old Testament; and by consequence, they would avoid
the necessity of the Mormons counterfeiting a bible for them. Besides, as the Mormons tell us,
that Jesus Christ was among the Indians here, and preached to them at the same time that he was
among the Jews, they must have known something of the New Testament, of Christ’s mission
into the world however. If I mistake not, I marked an account of seventeen great cities, which
Pratt says existed in this country, and were destroyed in the 34th year. At which time, he says,
the darkness was so great, that fire could not be kindled with fine dry wood. Every person who
knows any thing of philosophy, knows that life cannot continue where fire will not burn. This
must have been an age of miracles, like the present. However, we will now suppose, that about
A. D. 450, this country had a vast multitude of Ephraimites in it, and that they had great cities, all
kinds of tradesmen, and the sciences of navigation, reading, writing, arithmetic, and
consequently the Scripture, particularly the Mormon Bible, and of course a multitude of other
books. Why did not the Lemonites preserve a few of their books, at least a few copies of their
Scripture, if not for their own instruction, to satisfy the Mormons of its truth. When did they
agree to forget themselves? to forget who they were? When did they purpose to destroy their
Scripture and all their other books? their schools, furnaces, forges, smiths, carpenters, masons,
&c.? Would it not be impossible, to persuade us to destroy our manufactories, tradesmen,
Scripture, books, schools, farmers, ploughs, harrows, wagons, axes, &c., &c., &c., and rush into
a state of profound ignorance of every useful art and science of even ourselves? O says a
Mormon advocate, Alexander Selkirk was in the Island of Juan Fernandez till he nearly forgot
his language. I suppose it is hardly necessary to observe, that Selkirk was alone in this island,
remote from books, and all means of improvement, and preservation of his acquirements; not so
with the Ephraimites here; they were in society, and had every inducement and means to
preserve their knowledge. Now Mr. Bennett, tell us how the Ephraimites acquired a knowledge
of the Reformed Egyptian language? And why were the golden plates engraved in this language
for Israelites? This is Mormon miracle all over, what astonishing believers the Mormons are!
Mr. Bennett in his Reply, says, “The authenticity of the book of Mormon rests exactly
upon the same foundation, that [6] the communications of the Almighty to the human family,
ever have rested in any age of the world, viz: the testimony of men of honesty and veracity.”
Whoever reflects upon the manner in which the Mormon bible was got up, will be convinced
how much veracity there is in this fallacious assertion. The Mormon Bible was transformed, and
got up altogether in the dark, represented indeed, as being accompanied with a multitude of
miracles, but such as none but Mormons ever saw. In a word all the marks of imposture cluster
round this criminal work of darkness. This abominable falsehood, is yet more evident, if we
advert to the manner in which the law and gospel were given. See the 19th chapter of Exodus.
Here, in the presence of 600,000 men, besides women and children, there were thunders and
lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount, the voice of a trumpet exceeding loud, so that all
the people in the camp trembled. Mount Sinai altogether in a smoke; the smoke ascending as the
smoke of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked greatly. There had been miracles achieved;
stupendous, public and numerous; not such as no one ever saw. Ten of which had been
performed in Egypt, and were witnessed by both Israelites and Egyptians. The red sea had been
divided, and the cloudy pillar by day, and fiery pillar by night had gone before the whole
congregation. The gospel also had preceded, accompanied, and succeeded by miracles, public,
mighty and numerous. In the words of the gospel by Matthew, xv, 30—And great multitudes
came unto him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others,
and cast them down at Jesus’ feet; and he healed them; insomuch that the multitude wondered,
when they SAW the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to
see. The dead were raised, the sun was darkened, the earth quaked, the rocks rent, and the graves
opened: such mighty miracles has God been pleased, because he saw them proper to achieve
upon the giving of the law and gospel, to authenticate them, neither of which dispensations, was
to be increased or diminished. Now, Mr. Bennett, where is the authenticity for your Mormon
bible? I unhestitatingly affirm that it has not a particle of it; and moreover, that by the
introduction of your spurious bible, unauthenticated by any divine attestations, which you are
attempting to palm on the world for revelation, you incur the terrible penalty denounced against
impostors—Rev. xxii, 18, “If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the
plagues that are written in this book. The testimony of men, however honest they may be, is
insufficient of itself to establish a revelation from God. To prove and establish, and show to the
world its divine origin, authority and obligations, it must be accompanied by the achievement of
works, public and seen, above all human and magical powers; such works as I have already
showed, both Mosaic and Christian dispensations were accompanied with.— [7] And whoever
essays to bring up revelations without such accompaniments, should be regarded, and in justice
is regarded, as a criminal impostor, undeserving any credit, dangerous to the welfare of the
community, and exposed to the punishment of hellfire. I have already given an example or two,
to show how much the Mormons regard veracity, and before the conclusion of this work, I shall
give many more. Perhaps, a little raillery here, may not be judged misplaced, particularly when
we consider, that to “Answer a fool according to his folly,” is a Scriptural precept.
Beyond the bounds of truth and sense,
In dreams and smoke, and darkness dense,
We’ve travelled for a game;
Where ghosts and goblins stalk abroad,
And where there is a carnal God,
To magnify our name.
We’ll sport along, and gladly look,
To Spaulding’s Indian Mormon book,
Reveal’d to big Jo. Smith;
His handy craft, he’ll to us tell,
Which will our gloomy fears dispel;
We’ll glory in his pith.*
In hope of that great airy town,
In which we shortly shall sit down,
And lovely misses gain;
No human laws will then be found,
Which to our pleasures raise a mound;
They’ll bear without a pain.
We’ll sound the tidings, and we’ll tell
To them whom we shut up in hell,
Enlighten’d by the flames;
Although surrounded by the smoke,
Which sometimes may our lingo choke,
We’ll wash away their stains.
*Strength, of which Smith boasted considerably.
We’ll give them signs and dreams enough,
And tales and stories of all stuff,
Which we have never seen;
And let the work their own faith do,
Or be undone ‘tis very true,
We’ve mighty power we mean.
There’s none but we, that’s right, we guess;
We are the only ones that bless,
These fourteen hundred years;
You must believe, repent and turn
To Mormon faith, or on you’ll burn,
In nothing more than fears. [8]
Shall we have here in our enlightened country, a Mahomet and Koran? Let those who
would be convinced of the effects of countenancing imposture, read an account of the state of
those countries, wherein Mahometanism has prevailed, and I presume, they will not be much
disposed to favor, or put their necks under the fell yoke of Mormonism, which if unshackled,
perhaps, would be many degrees the worse of the two. . . . [9] . . .
I received from a friend, the testimony of two persons of Susquehannah county, given
January 27th, 1840, viz: Ichabod Buck, and Nathaniel Banker, who declare upon oath, that they
were acquainted with J. Smith, and that he commenced his Mormonism about four miles from
the residence of said Ichabod Buck. That said J. Smith seduced Mr. Isaac Hale’s daughter, and
ran away with her into the [23] State of New Yord; that in the opinion of all intelligent person, so
far as they are acquainted, Smith is an impostor of the blackest kind; and that he was a cunning
designing knave, whose moral character was bad in all respects; and that with most of his
followers, the delusion has altogether subsided in this county, where it started. The deposition of
Mr. Banker adds, that the Mormon testimony, in one of their bibles, which he then had before
him, affirms that the golden plates, with their engraving, were brought by an angel, and laid
before the eyes of Smith and eleven more, and that said Smith translated them.* Sworn and
subscribed before
SAMUEL W. TRUESDELL.
*Pratt, in his Warning Voice, says the golden plates were dug out of, or found in, a hill in the State of New York,
originally called Cumora; see page 3.
Object Description
| Rating | |
| Author | Philanthropist of Chester County |
| Title | Mormonism Unmasked, Showed to Be an Impious Imposture, and Mr. Bennett's Reply Answered and Refuted |
| Edition | Electronic reproduction |
| Abstract | An anonymous writer, having written a previous pamphlet critical of the Book of Mormon, responds to S. Bennett's criticism of his original work. |
| Publisher Original | T. K. & P. G. Collins |
| Date Original | 1840 |
| Digital Publisher | Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship at Brigham Young University |
| Date Digital | 2009-06 |
| Owning Institution | Brigham Young University |
| Subject | Book of Mormon--History; |
| Geographic Place Name | Philadelphia (Pa.); |
| Genre | Pamphlets (Pa.); |
| Keywords | Book of Mormon; Jesus Christ; persecution; American Indian; revelation; Smith, Joseph, 1805-1844; |
| Source | Mormonism Unmasked, Showed to Be an Impious Imposture, and Mr. Bennett’s Reply Answered and Refuted, 2-24. Philadelphia: T. K. & P. G. Collins, 1840. |
| Related Works | Bennett, S. A Few Remarks by Way of Reply to an Anonymous Scribbler, Calling Himself a Philanthropist, Disabusing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints of the Slanders and Falsehoods Which he Has Attempted to Fasten Upon It. Philadelphia: Brown, Bicking & Guilpert, 1840; Snow, Erastus Fairbanks. E. Snow’s Reply to the Self-Styled Philanthropist, of Chester County. Philadelphia?: s.n., [1840?] |
| Language | English; eng; en; |
| Patron Usage Instructions | http://www.lib.byu.edu/genericnote_copyright.html |
| Copyright status/owner | Public Domain, Courtesy Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship at Brigham Young University |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Conversion specifications | E-Image Data Scanpro 1000; 600dpi; pdf |
| Full text | Transcriptions provided by the Maxwell Institute |
| Identifier | 1840_Philan |
Description
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Open Facsimile 1
