Later from Utah.
ST. LOUIS, Wednesday, April 27, 1859.
Accounts from various private sources on the Mor-mon side represent the condition of affairs in Utah as materially different to what has been previously re-ported. It is positively stated that there is even a symptom of a hostile demonstration; that persons are subpenaed as witnesses, and then arrested and placed in charge of the troops for safe keeping; that the Sheriff of Utah County had notified Judge Cradle-baugh that he was prepared to take charge of all prisoners accused of crime, saying at the same time that he had a secure jail and would increase his bond to any extent that the Judge required; the Grand Jury were just prepared to make a presentment when they were discharged, and that they had protested against the action of the Court. It is also asserted that Gov. Cumming, Secretary Harnett, Prosecuting-Attorney Wilson and Dr. Forney are opposed to and at the course pursued by Sinclair and Cradlebaugh.
The Deseret News has published a memorial from the people to Gov. Cumming, attempting to prove the illegality of Judge Cradlebaugh holding Court at Provo. It also severely criticises the Judge's course, and accuses him of setting himself up against the civil authorities of the Territory in employing the troops to execute the orders of the Court, without a valid rea-son, thus clearly a total disregard of the latest ex-pressed policy of the Administration concerning Utah. It also charges him with a settled purpose to force a collision between the people of the Territory and the troops.
The Mormons seem to regard President Buchanan's proclamation as exempting parties from arrest for all past offenses.
